7 weeks to become compliant with Mass Privacy Act

Visage Solutions has been helping service providers with becoming SAS70 certified for over five years. They have also assisted organization become compliant with a number of regulations and frameworks including Sarbanes-Oxley, GLBA, HIPAA, ISO27001, COBIT, Red Flag Rule and now the Mass Privacy Law,

The Massachusetts Privacy Act, which has already been revised and postponed three times, now requires all covered entities to achieve full compliance by March 1, 2010. This new deadline, announced on August 17, 2009 and confirmed in November 2009 when the Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation filed its final amendments, provides an extra two months for companies to achieve compliance.

Many facets of the new Massachusetts Privacy Law increase a company’s exposure to lawsuits. The ramifications of not complying become quite real should an information security breach occur.  In such a case, if it is determined at the examination that the law’s compliance requirements have not been met, the Massachusetts Attorney General can file suit against the company.

Any business that has personal information for any resident of Massachusetts has to comply with this regulation. Most service providers us SAS70 as a means of confirming that they have a reasonable control environment. However, most SAS70’s so not address the specific requirements of this regulation. Below is a list of the requirements and how most SAS70’s address the regulation. 

Paragraph Number

Area

Control

Comments

Guidance

17.03.a

Information Security Responsibility

Designating one or more employees to maintain the comprehensive information security program;

Most SAS70's  refer to a Security Policy, often the person responsible is not identified

refer to the Security Officer in the Control Environment section of the SAS70

17.03.b.i

Information Security Training

Ongoing employee (including temporary and contract employee) training

Most SAS70 indicate that employees do get training on information security

Make sure there is some proof that employees get some sort of training yearly

17.03.b.ii

Information Security Compliance

employee compliance with policies and procedures;

Most SAS70 refer to policies and procedures and even have people indicate they have read and understand them. Seldom is there any proof that people actually follow them.

Identifying a policy as a control will have the auditor look for six months worth of proof that people are following procedures. Difficult and costly to do.

17.03.b.iii

Information Security Monitoring

means for detecting and preventing security system failures

most SAS70 document the incident reporting system, but do little to identify what the actual mechanism is for detecting controls

Identify an objective that addresses a reasonable level of assurance that security breaches are identified and responded to.

17.03.c

Information Security Policies

Developing security policies for employees that take into account whether and how employees should be allowed to keep access and transport records containing personal information outside of business premises.

Most SAS70's don't address something like this, however these types of items are often identified in the security policy

The security policy can potentially be given to the person who requests to review the SAS70.

17.03.d

Disciplinary measures

Imposing disciplinary measures for violations of the comprehensive information security program rules.

Most SAS70's don't address something like this, however these types of items are often identified in the security policy

The security policy can potentially be given to the person who requests to review the SAS70.

17.03.3

Terminated Employees

Preventing terminated employees from accessing records containing personal information by immediately terminating their physical and electronic access to such records, including deactivating their passwords and user names.

Most SAS70's address this requirement. However, may providers be able to prove they handle this immediately?

This will involve putting in procedures that allows HR to ensure access is terminated simultaneously to termination.

17.03.f.i

Capable Third party providers

Taking reasonable steps to verify that third-party service providers with access to personal information have the capacity to protect such personal information, including (i) selecting and retaining service providers that are capable of maintaining safeguards for personal information; and .

This typically applies to a SaaS provider who uses and Infrastructure provider. Often they include that SAS70 as part of their own.

Ensure third party SAS70's are addressed in yours if appropriate.

17.03.f.ii

SLAs with Third Parties

Contractually requiring service providers to maintain such safeguards. Prior to permitting third-party service providers access to personal information, the person permitting such access shall obtain from the third-party service provider a written certification that such service provider has a written, comprehensive information security program that is in compliance with the provisions of these regulations.

Service Level Agreements are usually not mentioned in the SAS70. Service Level Agreements are usually written on favorable terms for the provider and as such sometimes do not satisfy this requirement.

Review your Service Level Agreements to ensure that these requirements are addressed.

17.03.g

Limitations and Retention

Limiting the amount of personal information collected to that reasonably necessary to accomplish the legitimate purpose for which it is collected; limiting the time such information is retained to that reasonably necessary to accomplish such purpose; and limiting access to those persons who are reasonably required to know such information in order to accomplish such purpose or to comply with state or federal record retention requirements.

These types of items are usually not identified in any SAS70 since they are typically a part of the application and SAS70's do not address application code.

You may elect to have an independent third party do a code review and/or penetration test when they can provide an independent third parties view of meeting this requirement.

17.03.h

Personal Info Xref

Identifying paper, electronic and other records, computing systems, and storage media, including laptops and portable devices used to store personal information, to determine which records contain personal information, except where the comprehensive information security program provides for the handling of all records as if they all contained personal information.

SAS70's seldom identify this type of list as a control

This list may be provided along with the SAS70 until it can be included in your next SAS70.

17.03.i

Physical Access

Reasonable restrictions upon physical access to records containing personal information, including a written procedure that sets forth the manner in which physical access to such records is restricted; and storage of such records and data in locked facilities, storage areas or containers.

SAS70's usually address physical access to computers and files and seldom address personal information which can also be found outside of the data center.

Develop a control that provides reasonable assurance that records cannot be stored outside of those designated secure areas. Make sure your test data isn't mealy an un-sanitized copy of production data.

17.03.j

Monitoring

Regular monitoring to ensure that the comprehensive information security program is operating in a manner reasonably calculated to prevent unauthorized access to or unauthorized use of personal information; and upgrading information safeguards as necessary to limit risks.

SAS70's usually address monitoring for security breaches, but seldom address monitoring to make sure the entire security policy is operating effectively.

The person identified as the owner of the security program will have to show evidence of monitoring its effectiveness.

17.03.k

Periodic Review of Security Strategy

Reviewing the scope of the security measures at least annually or whenever there is a material change in business practices that may reasonably implicate the security or integrity of records containing personal information.

Most SAS70's indicate that policies are reviewed yearly but not necessarily after a security breach.

Evidence of a review against the policy for any security breach would have to be documented.

17.03.l

Incident management

Documenting responsive actions taken in connection with any incident involving a breach of security, and mandatory post-incident review of events and actions taken, if any, to make changes in business practices relating to protection of personal information.

Most SAS70's identify incident tracking but seldom is there any proof that business practices were reviewed to assist in making sure the breach does not occur again.

Evidence of a review against the procedure for any security breach would have to be documented.

17.04.1.i

User ID

control of user IDs and other identifiers;

Usually covered by all SAS70's

 

17.04.1.ii

Use of Passwords

a reasonably secure method of assigning and selecting passwords, or use of unique identifier technologies, such as biometrics or token devices;

Most SAS70's refer to the Security policy to address this requirement.

The security policy can potentially be given to the person who requests to review the SAS70.

17.04.1.iii

Securing passwords

control of data security passwords to ensure that such passwords are kept in a location and/or format that does not compromise the security of the data they protect;

Most SAS70's do not address this requirement.

make sure passwords are protected or are encrypted to all but the end user

17.04.1.iv

Active users and accounts

restricting access to active users and active user accounts only

These types of items are usually not identified in any SAS70 since they are typically a part of the application and SAS70's do not address application code.

Can be addressed by an independent third party assessment of the code.

17.04.1.v

Multiple Attempts

blocking access to user identification after multiple unsuccessful attempts to gain access or the limitation placed on access for the particular system;

Most SAS70's address "reasonable" controls and do not necessarily specifically address multiple attempts.  This may be addressed in your security policy.

The security policy can potentially be given to the person who requests to review the SAS70.

17.04.2.i

Need to know

restrict access to records and files containing personal information to those who need such information to perform their job duties;

This is usually addressed in most SAS70's.

 

17.04.2.ii

No default passwords

information to perform their job duties; and (ii) assign unique identifications plus passwords, which are not vendor supplied default passwords, to
each person with computer access, that are reasonably designed to maintain the integrity of the security of the access controls

Seldom is this requirement specifically addressed in a SAS70.

Make sure default passwords are removed from vendor software.

17.04.3

Encryption of data in flight

To the extent technically feasible, encryption of all transmitted records and files containing personal information that will travel across public networks, and encryption of all data to be transmitted wirelessly

Most SAS70's will address this requirement if in fact encryption is used.

Make sure encryption is used for data in flight.

17.04.4

Monitoring for unauthorized use

Reasonable monitoring of systems, for unauthorized use of or access to personal information

Most SAS70's address this requirement.

 

17.04.5

Encryption of mobile data

Encryption of all personal information stored on laptops or other portable devices;

Most SAS70's will address this requirement if in fact encryption is used.

Make sure encryption is used for mobile data.

17.04.6

Firewall protection

For files containing personal information on a system that is connected to the Internet, there must be reasonably up-to-date firewall protection and operating system security patches, reasonably designed to maintain the integrity of the personal information

Most SAS70's address this requirement.

 

17.04.7

Malware protection

Reasonably up-to-date versions of system security agent software which must include malware protection and reasonably up-to-date patches and virus definitions, or a version of such software that can still be supported with up-to-date patches and virus definitions, and is set to receive the most current security updates on a regular basis.

Most SAS70's address this requirement.

 

17.04.8

Education and Training

Education and training of employees on the proper use of the computer security system and the importance of personal information security

Most SAS70's address the fact the training occurs but not necessarily what is covered in the training. The Security policy usually identifies that needs to be in the training.

The security policy can potentially be given to the person who requests to review the SAS70.

 

 

About Visage Solutions – www.VisageSolutions.com

Visage Solutions is a consulting company operating in the areas of regulatory compliance, risk assessment, information security, risk management and compliance processes. Utilizing our proprietary SingleVue™ and OpsAudit™ methodologies, the company focuses on assisting business entities in mitigating operational risk. Visage has provided solutions to a client base ranging from private, entrepreneurial companies to large multinationals. Our team is comprised of experienced executives, managers and consultants who can assist clients with the development, implementation and execution of their risk management and compliance strategy.

 

 


"The Visage Risk assessment tool and methodology allowed us to respond the risk assessment requirements of the FFIEC in a timely and cost effective manner ".
   Robert Kernodle, SVP and Risk Officer of Cornerstone Bank
 
"Although there is always a degree of subjectivity in any risk assessment, the Visage Risk Assessment tool and methodology is one of the best I've seen in removing subjectivity and providing the underlying support for the scoring system".
   Patrick Camblin Senior Partner in Camblin CPA, PLLC

if you would no longer like to receive periodic updates from VisageSolutions, please follow the unsubscription instructions at the bottom of the email.
Copyright © 2009 Visage Solutions, LLC.